(March 11, 2009) The Christian Science Monitor website had the following article: “The coming evangelical collapse” written by Michael Spencer, a well known Christian blogger and former pastor of the Southern Baptist denomination. He writes “We are on the verge – within 10 years – of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity. This breakdown will follow the deterioration of the mainline Protestant world and it will fundamentally alter the religious and cultural environment in the West.” He lists seven reasons as to why this collapse will take place. I will highlight a few:
“1. Evangelicals have identified their movement with the culture war and with political conservatism. This will prove to be a very costly mistake. Evangelicals will increasingly be seen as a threat to cultural progress. Public leaders will consider us bad for America, bad for education, bad for children, and bad for society.”
“4. Despite some very successful developments in the past 25 years, Christian education has not produced a product that can withstand the rising tide of secularism.”
“6. Even in areas where Evangelicals imagine themselves strong (like the Bible Belt), we will find a great inability to pass on to our children a vital evangelical confidence in the Bible and the importance of the faith.”
Part of Mr. Spencer’s conclusion states the following: “The loss of their political clout may impel many Evangelicals to reconsider the wisdom of trying to create a “godly society.” That doesn’t mean they’ll focus solely on saving souls, but the increasing concern will be how to keep secularism out of church, not stop it altogether. The integrity of the church as a countercultural movement with a message of “empire subversion” will increasingly replace a message of cultural and political entitlement.”
Lastly, he adds a disclaimer: “I’m not a prophet. My view of evangelicalism is not authoritative or infallible. I am certainly wrong in some of these predictions. But is there anyone who is observing evangelicalism in these times who does not sense that the future of our movement holds many dangers and much potential?”
His overiding premise is based on the fact that “[Evangelical Christians] will soon be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century.” I concur with his assessment. In September of 2004 I wrote an article on my crudely created first website at iesouschristos.com (In early 2006 I changed the look of this website to its current appearance www.iesouschristos.com; I no longer contribute to this website as I believe the Culture War is over) You can read the original article at:
archive.org or on the current website at iesouschristos.com
The following is that article in its entirety as written on September 4, 2004:
Will America persecute Christians in the future?
Recent events in America’s history have led me to wonder if it’s possible that Christians will be persecuted in the United States of America in the future.
Persecution of Christians started at the very beginning of Christianity with the stoning of the follower of Jesus Christ, Stephen. Shortly thereafter the Roman Empire tortured and killed many Christians because of their beliefs. Persecution of Christians has continued to our present day by Fascist, Communist, and Islamic countries. More Christians were killed in the 20th century than all the other centuries combined (carm.org). Jesus prophesied that persecution of His followers would take place when He said: “You will be hated by all men for My name’s sake” (Mark 13:13).
American Christians have been spared persecution during the first few hundred years of the United States existence. That is because America was founded, not upon the principle of “freedom from religion, but rather upon “freedom forreligion”! Since the middle of the 20th century however our society has moved towards becoming a secular state. Various judicial rulings have undermined the Judeo-Christian system of beliefs that America was founded on. The phrase “separation of Church and State” has become the mantra of those people who would like to see America become a completely secularized state. It is clear that the American judicial system has become increasingly antagonistic toward those who hold to the Christian faith.
There are a few examples that I will point out of recent rulings against Christianity and those who hold similar viewpoints of faith. It started with the banning of prayer in our school system in 1962 by the Supreme Court of the United States. I believe this was the beginning of an attack on our country’s youth. Instead of giving young people a reassurance that their lives were not a random act of evolution, it led them to a belief that they were ultimately accountable to no one. In the late 1960′s America experienced a “sexual revolution” which had as it foundational principle: “If it feels good, do it!” This led young Americans to engage in sexual “freedom” which resulted in sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. The next logical step in this progression led to another Supreme Court ruling in 1973 which allowed women to have a “legal” abortion. So if your sexual freedom led to a pregnancy then all you had to do to solve the problem was to abort your unborn baby. Then in the 1980′s this sexual revolution allowed the homosexual community to openly announce that they intended to promote their lifestyle in the American culture. They did suffer a setback with the discovery of the HIV virus known as AIDS. Rather than reassess the choices they were making with their lives they demanded that America find a cure for this disease so that they could continue to flaunt their homosexuality. Indeed, a cure should be found for this and all the other diseases that humans suffer but they turned that suffering into a political movement. The entertainment industry helped to promote their agenda through television shows and movies that had homosexual characters in them. The media also tried to change American’s view on homosexuality by presenting it as an “alternative lifestyle”. This acceptance of homosexuality was implemented in our school system’s curricula through books and courses designed to influence future generations of Americans to accept it as part of our society. Those people who have supported and implemented the secularization of America have been very successful in their efforts. Since 1973 the equivalent of 1/7 (43,000,000) of our current population has been exterminated through abortion. Also sexual “freedom” is permeating every area of our society so that teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases are an accepted part of our culture. However, for the secularists to have total reign over our culture there is one obstacle they have to overcome.
That obstacle is Christians who continue to believe in a God who will hold His creations, human beings, accountable one day. That the Church has played a role in the decline of our culture has some validity. We Christians have also engaged in sinful behavior. As such we need to repent of our sins and of our participation in this process. Jesus said Christians are to be the “light of the world” yet we have failed in many aspects of this calling. I believe that we are moving in this direction but obviously still have a ways to go. One way that we are trying to change is through the political process upon which our democracy is based. Up until recent years Christians have not been engaged in the stopping of the deterioration of our culture. I believe that participation in the democratic process by Christians is a legitimate means of trying to stem the tide of cultural demise. But that does not alleviate us from our responsibility to change people’s hearts through words, behaviors, and prayer. I’ve heard people say you can’t legislate morality. This is a fallacy because most legislation is based on morality. Otherwise, why is it wrong to murder and steal? The animal kingdom kills one another for food or territory yet we do not assign a standard of morality to their behavior. Humans, on the other hand, do understand right and wrong because God has written His laws upon our hearts (Romans 2:11-15). So the electoral process is one responsible way for Christians to overcome the threat to our American culture. However, recent events have led me to the conclusion that Christians in America will one day be persecuted as Jesus Christ said we would.
Early in 2004 a movie based on the crucifixion of Jesus Christ made a tremendous impact on our culture. This movie, called “The Passion of the Christ” was seen by millions of people around the world. However, it received a tremendous amount of opposition from secularists and the media. There were predictions of anti-Semitism running rampant in the streets of America (none of which ever materialized). Christianity was referred to as an intolerant religion and a religion of torture and death. Yet in spite of this hysteria many people were positively impacted by the message of this movie. But the concern is that large segments of our society revealed a deep hatred of Christians and their beliefs.
Another, and even more revealing, event took place later in the year. The Presidential election campaign of 2004 illustrated clearly the cultural divide that has been growing in America between secularist liberals and Christian conservatives. I have never seen an election process that was even close to exhibiting the vitriolic language and animosity towards those who supported the Christian values held by our President than this one did. The apostle Paul wrote that humans do not ultimately wrestle against flesh and blood but against spiritual entities who are opposed to the ways of God (Ephesians 6:10-17). There is not one doubt in my mind that the battle for our culture is being fought in the spiritual realm. The behavior by those opposed to traditional Christian values was evidence enough that this is in fact the case. After the President was re-elected, it was determined that a large part of his support came from those people who did hold traditional beliefs. The opposition immediately started denigrating people of faith through the media and the Internet. The hostility intensified to an even greater level towards Christians than before the election. The fact that several states passed amendments to their constitutions which prohibited same-sex marriage gave more impetus to this hatred. The results of this election, which appear to be a repudiation of liberal values, do seem to give a reprieve to our cultural decline but I believe it will only be a momentary one.
The problem is that liberals have found that since they are unable to control the executive and legislative branches at all levels of our government they will push their secularist agenda through the judicial branch. As noted above, the judiciary of America has ruled very often in their favor and very often against values of faith. That the secularists will continue down this path of using judicial activists to further their cause is a fact of history. I believe that ultimately there will be laws legislated by these activist judges in our country that will result in an attempt to silence Christians from preaching their beliefs.
As mentioned earlier, persecution of Christians is occurring in countries that have closed societies. But recently there has been an alarming development in Western-style or democratic-type countries. The country of Sweden has passed “hate-crimes” legislation which prohibit speech that is considered hateful towards others. In a well known case a pastor in Sweden was sentenced to one month in prison for preaching against homosexuality during a sermon in 2003. Canada has also passed similar “hate-crimes” legislation recently. In 2004 a effort was made to expand current federal “hate-crimes” laws in America to include crimes based on gender, sexual-orientation, and disability. This legislation would have made it easier for local law enforcement agencies and courts to prosecute those accused of “hate crimes”. This amendment was approved by the Senate as a part of a Defense authorization bill. But because House Republicans opposed this provisional amendment it was removed from this bill. The issue of adding sexual-orientation to the Federal “hate crimes” law will be raised again in 2005 according to the bill’s sponsors. If and when this law is passed it may lead eventually to the same scenario that has already occurred in Sweden. Ministers who speak against homosexuality because of their belief in the Bible and what is has to say on this issue may one day be arrested in America for espousing their views. Some would say that this could never happen in America where the First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees free speech. There was an incident during the 2004 Presidential campaign which may cause some to reconsider the impossibility of America clamping down on free speech. It was glossed over by the media rather quickly.
There was a film that was going to be shown by a television broadcasting company that was going to be detrimental to the Democratic candidate, John Kerry. Eventually an uproar in the media and other liberal circles prevailed and this company edited out parts of the film that were the cause of such consternation. But there was one specific incident that occurred during this controversy that I want to point out. It pertains to statement made by a Kerry campaign aide: “Listen, they better look out there at Sinclair Broadcasting. I’m not a lawyer, but they’ve stirred up a lot of hatred. We’ve got thousands of people now very mad, jackballed up – calling these [Sinclair] stations, protesting, threatening boycotts of their sponsors. I think they’re going to regret doing this. They better hope we don’t win.” The chilling implication of this statement was that if the liberals were elected to office they would use their power to stifle the speech of a national media outlet. That they were willing to admit that they would commit such an egregious violation of what many consider to be the greatest of our rights listed in the Constitution is almost beyond belief. But as I’ve noted in this article, secularists and liberals have not been reticent to change the culture we have had in America for 200 years by using whatever means necessary to achieve their goals.
Though the sweep by conservatives in the recent national and state elections may stem the progression of the liberal agenda in America, I believe that eventually liberal activist judges will find ways to continue their implementation of this agenda such as that exhibited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court. When they do come to power I believe that eventually Christians in America will be persecuted by our government. I believe that this persecution will occur within a decade of this time. I do not believe for one moment that my position is overly dramatic. As I pointed out earlier the courts have ruled consistently against religion in the public arena. That persecution could happen here as hatred in America continues to build against those who hold to the values as espoused by the Bible is not only possible but probable. Why should Christians not believe Jesus Christ when He said: “You will be hated by all men for My name’s sake”?!
[end of 2004 article]
I still believe that Christians will be persecuted in America as they continue to be around the world. The U.S. Constitution has replaced the Bible as the authoritative voice in America. Though the media has declined recently in numbers they have not lost their power to influence Americans. They played a large part in the election of the very liberal Barack Obama for president. Bible-believing Christianity is not politically correct. To say that abortion and homosexual marriage is wrong is an affront to the secularists’ sensibilities. I don’t see how Biblical Christianity can exist as a significant part of American society with the assault that secularist judges, politicians, and media outlets are continuing to exert against it.
Jesus made an intriguing statement during His ministry which I’m not sure exactly was He was referring to when He said it: “Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?” (Luke 18:8) One possible meaning could refer to His second coming which takes place at the end of the seven year Tribulation Period (a terrible time of devastation that the whole world will go through). It is possible that since a large part of the world’s population will be destroyed during that time, the majority of those who remain will be followers of the Antichrist and will have killed the many of the followers of God. In discussing the signs of the End-Times with His disciples on the Mount of Olives Jesus said, “8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. 9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake. 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. 11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.” (Matthew 24:8-12) Whether or not this is what Jesus meant when He questioned whether He would find faith on earth at His return I cannot say. I do believe that America will further decline in Christian truth and will be open to all kinds of deception that will lead to its downfall.
Related posts:
- “And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke” (April 24, 2010) Today is the twentieth anniversary of the Hubble Space Telescope launch. In commemoration of that event NASA released this photo. This extraordinary display of God's creation brings to mind a prophecy from the Book of Joel: "1 Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm...
- U. S. Comptroller General warns that America parallels the fall of the Roman Empire (August 14, 2007) "Drawing parallels with the end of the Roman empire, Mr Walker warned there were 'striking similarities' between America’s current situation and the factors that brought down Rome, including 'declining moral values and political civility at home, an over-confident and over-extended military in foreign lands and fiscal irresponsibility...
- Make Way Partners: Wiping away tears on earth now – Revelation 21:1-4 (April 28, 2011) Yesterday, I heard the most disturbing thing I've ever heard on the radio. If what follows disturbs you then maybe God is trying to work in your heart as He is in mine. American Family Radio (AFR) conducted an interview with Kimberly L. Smith, president and co-founder...
- October Updates: Economic Crises, Antichrist, Russia and Israel (October 12, 2008) According to the September 25th Financial Times the United States will lose its superpower status. ("US ‘will lose financial superpower status’")...Russia continues to assert their military strength after invading Georgia and making arms deals with Venezuela. Now they have test-fired long-range ballistic missiles. ("Russia test-fires ballistic missiles")...
- World economic fears and the decline of the United States (November 20, 2008) The economies of the world seem to be on the verge of collapse and it is causing fear around the world. (Fear stalks the world’s economies) According to this article, "Market analysts said panic had set in among traders. 'Markets are utterly unhinged,' said Bill O’Donnell, a...
- Is it all falling apart? (even if it is God is stll in control) (June 18, 2010) The subtitle of my blog is What in the world is going on? Looking at news events occurring around the world I think an even more appropriate question is, Is it all falling apart? In my lifetime (52 years) I have seen dramatic changes in socioeconomic, cultural,...
- Is God judging America? (March 6, 2009) Recently I read the following headlines on the same day: "On The Road To Socialism? We've Arrived!" "Bair Says Insurance Fund Could Be Insolvent This Year" "What Are the Odds of a Depression?" Everyday you can read headlines as bad as this or worse. My immediate thought...
- Leaders want to restructure world’s economic system (November 15, 2008) According to the Washington Post the Group of 20 nations (G20) agreed today to restructure the economic systems of the world over the next year. (World Leaders Agree to Sweeping Economic Plan) This agreement "would reshape international financial institutions and overhaul worldwide regulatory and accounting rules." The...
- World ending in 2012 according to ancient Mayans and others? (October 13, 2009) Between the History Channel, Jack Van Impe, Hollywood, and the Media one could get the idea that something cataclysmic is going to occur in December of 2012. Two days ago the Drudge Report linked to an article titled "2012 isn't the end of the world, Mayans insist"....
- Two AP writers suggest world is spinning out of control (June 21, 2008) Associated Press reporters Alan Fram and Eileen Putman wrote an article suggesting world events are spiraling out of control. (Everything seemingly is spinning out of control) They write, "Midwestern levees are bursting. Polar bears are adrift. Gas prices are skyrocketing. Home values are abysmal. Air fares, college...
Print This Post
Tags: America, decline, Matthew 24, Tribulation Period
(Did you see the following on the internet? Most interesting! Isabella)
PRETRIB RAPTURE DISHONESTY
by Dave MacPherson
When I began my research in 1970 into the exact beginnings of the pretribulation rapture belief still held by many evangelicals, I assumed that the rapture debate involved only “godly scholars with honest differences.” The paper you are now reading reveals why I gave up that assumption many years ago. With this introduction-of-sorts in mind, let’s take a long look at the pervasive dishonesty throughout the history of the 179-year-old pretrib rapture theory:
Mid-1820′s – German scholar Max Weremchuk’s work “John Nelson Darby” (1992) included what Benjamin Newton revealed about John Darby in the mid-1820′s during his pre-Brethren days as an Anglican clergyman:
“J. N. Darby was a very subtle man. He had been a lawyer, or at least educated for the law. Once he wanted his Archbishop to pursue a certain course, when he (J.N.D.) was a curate in his diocese. He wrote a letter, therefore, saying he had been educated for the law, knew what the legal course would properly be; and then having written that clearly, he mystified the remainder of the letter both in word and in handwriting, and ended up by saying: You see, my Lord, such being the legal aspect of the case it would unquestionably be the best course for you to pursue, etc. And the Archbishop couldn’t make out the legal part, but rested on Darby’s word and did as he advised. Darby afterwards laughed over it, and indeed he showed a copy of the letter to Tregelles. This is not mentioned in the Archbishop’s biography, but in it is the fact that he spoke of Darby as ‘the most subtle man in my diocese.’”
This reminds me of an 1834 letter by Darby which spoke of the “Lord’s coming.” Darby added, concerning this coming, that “the thoughts are new” and that during any teaching of it “it would not be well to have it so clear.” Darby’s deviousness here was his usage of a centuries-old term – “Lord’s coming” – to cover up his desire to sneak the new pretrib idea into existing posttrib groups in very low-profile ways!
1830 – In the spring of 1830 a young Scottish lassie, Margaret Macdonald, came up with the novel notion of a catching up [rapture] of Spirit-filled “church” members before Antichrist’s “trial” [tribulation] of non-Spirit-filled “church” members – the first instance I’ve found of clear “pretrib” teaching (which was part of a partial rapture scheme). In Sep. 1830 “The Morning Watch” (a journal produced by London preacher Edward Irving and his “Irvingite” followers, some of whom had visited Margaret a few weeks earlier) began repeating her original thoughts and even her wording but gave her no credit – the first plagiarism I’ve found in pretrib history. Darby was still defending posttrib in Dec. 1830.
Pretrib promoters have long known the significance of her main point: a rapture of “church” members BEFORE the revealing of Antichrist. Which is why John Walvoord quoted nothing in her revelation, why Thomas Ice habitually skips over her main point but quotes lines BEFORE and AFTER it, and why Hal Lindsey muddies up her main point so he can (falsely) assert that she was NOT a pretribber! (Google “X-Raying Margaret” for info about her.)
NOTE: The development of the 1800′s is thoroughly documented in my book “The Rapture Plot.” You’ll learn that Darby wasn’t original on any chief aspect of dispensationalism (but plagiarized the Irvingites); that pretrib was initially based on only OT and NT symbols and not clear Scripture; that the symbols included the Jewish feasts, the two witnesses, and the man child – symbols adopted by Darby during most of his career; that Darby’s later reminiscences exaggerated his earliest pretrib development, and that today’s defenders such as Thomas Ice have further overstated what Darby overstated; that Irvingism didn’t need later reminiscences to “clarify” its own early pretrib development; that ancient hymns and even the writings of the Reformers were subtly revised to make it appear they had taught pretrib; and that after Darby’s death a clever revisionist quietly made many changes in early Irvingite and Brethren documents in order to steal credit for pretrib away from the Irvingites (and their female inspiration!) and give it dishonestly to Darby! (Before continuing, Google the “Powered by Christ Ministries” site and read “America’s Pretrib Rapture Traffickers” – a sample of the current exciting internetism!)
1920 – Charles Trumbull’s book “The Life Story of C. I. Scofield” told only the dispensationally-correct side of his life. Two recent books, Joseph Canfield’s “The Incredible Scofield and His Book” (1988) and David Lutzweiler’s “DispenSinsationalism: C. I. Scofield’s Life and Errors” (2006), reveal the other side including his being jailed as a forger, dishonestly giving himself a non-conferred “D.D.” etc. etc.!
1967 – Brethren scholar Harold Rowdon’s “The Origins of the Brethren” quoted Darby associate Lord Congleton who was “disgusted with…the falseness” of Darby’s accounts of things. Rowdon also quoted historian William Neatby who said that others felt that “the time-honoured method of single combat” was as good as anything “to elicit the truth” from Darby. (In other words, knock it out of him!)
1972 – Tim LaHaye’s “The Beginning of the End” (1972) plagiarized Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970).
1976 – Charles Ryrie”s “The Living End” (1976) plagiarized Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970) and “There’s A New World Coming” (1973).
1976 – After John Walvoord’s “The Blessed Hope and the Tribulation” (1976) brutally twisted Robert Gundry’s “The Church and the Tribulation” (1973), Gundry composed and circulated a 35-page open letter to Walvoord which repeatedly charged the Dallas Seminary president with “misrepresentation,” “misrepresentations” (and variations)!
1981 – “The Fundamentalist Phenomenon” (1981) by Jerry Falwell, Ed Dobson, and Ed Hindson heavily plagiarized George Dollar’s 1973 book “A History of Fundamentalism in America.”
1984 – After a prof at Southeastern College of the Assemblies of God in Florida told me that the No. 2 man at the AG world headquarters in Missouri – Joseph Flower – had the label of posttrib, my wife and I had two hour-long chats with him. He verified what I had been told. But we were dumbstruck when he told us that although AG ministers are required to promote pretrib, privately they can believe any other rapture view! Flower said that his father, an AG co-founder, was also posttrib. We also learned while in Springfield that when the AG’s were organized in 1914, the initial group was divided between posttribs and pretribs – but that the pretribs shouted louder which resulted in that denomination officially adopting pretrib! (For details on this and other pretrib double-mindedness, Google “Pretrib Hypocrisy.”)
1989 – Since 1989 Thomas Ice has referred to the “Mac-theory” (his reference to my research), giving the impression there’s no solid evidence that Macdonald was the real pretrib originator. But Ice carefully conceals the fact that no eminent church historian of the 1800′s – whether Plymouth Brethren or Irvingite – credited Darby with pretrib. Instead, they uniformly credited leading Irvingite sources, all of which upheld the Scottish lassie’s contribution! Moreover, I’m hardly the only modern scholar seeing significance in Irvingism’s territory. Others in recent years who have noted it, but who haven’t mined it as deeply as I have, include Fuller, Ladd, Bass, Rowdon, Sandeen, and Gundry.
1989 – Greg Bahnsen and Kenneth Gentry produced evidence in 1989 that Lindsey’s book “The Road to Holocaust” (1989) plagiarized “Dominion Theology” (1988) by H. Wayne House and Thomas Ice.
1990 – David Jeremiah’s and C. C. Carlson’s “Escape the Coming Night” (1990) massively plagiarized Lindsey’s 1973 book “There’s A New World Coming.” (For more info, type in “Thieves’ Marketing” on MSN or Google.)
1991 – Paul Lee Tan’s “A Pictorial Guide to Bible Prophecy” (1991) plagiarized large amounts of Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970).
1991 – Militant Darby defender R. A. Huebner claimed in 1991 to have found new evidence that Darby was pretrib as early as 1827 – three years before Macdonald. Halfway through his book Huebner suddenly admitted that his evidence could refer to something completely un-rapturesque. Even though Thomas Ice admitted to me that he knew that Huebner had “blown” his so-called evidence, prevaricator Ice continues to tell the world that Huebner has “positive evidence” that Darby was pretrib in 1827! Ice also conceals the fact that Darby, in his own 1827 paper, was looking for only “the restitution of all things” and “the times of refreshing” (Acts 3:19,21) – which Scofield doesn’t see fulfilled until AFTER a future tribulation!
1992 – Tim LaHaye’s “No Fear of the Storm” (1992) plagiarized Walvoord’s “The Blessed Hope and the Tribulation” (1976).
1992 – This was when the Los Angeles Times revealed that “The Magog Factor” (1992) by Hal Lindsey and Chuck Missler was a monstrous plagiarism of Prof. Edwin Yamauchi’s scholarly 1982 work “Foes from the Northern Frontier.” Four months after this exposure, Lindsey and Missler stated they had stopped publishing and promoting their book. But in 1996 Dr. Yamauchi learned that the dishonest duo had issued a 1995 book called “The Magog Invasion” which still had a substantial amount of the same plagiarism! (If Lindsey and Missler ever need hernia operations, I predict that the doctors will tell them not to lift anything for a long time!)
1994 – In 1996 it was revealed that Lindsey’s “Planet Earth – 2000 A.D. (1994) had an embarrassing amount of plagiarism of a Texe Marrs book titled “Mystery Mark of the New Age” (1988).
1995 – My book “The Rapture Plot” reveals the dishonesty in Darby’s reprinted works. It’s often hard to tell who wrote the footnotes and when. It’s easy to believe that the notes, and also unsigned phrases inside brackets within the text, were a devious attempt by someone (Darby? his editor?) to portray a Darby far more developed in pretrib thinking than he actually had been at the time. I found that some of the “additives” had been taken from Darby’s much later works, when he was more developed, and placed next to or inside his earliest works! One footnote by Darby’s editor, attached to Darby’s 1830 paper, actually stated that “it was not worth while either suppressing or changing” anything in this work! If his editor wasn’t open to such dishonesty, how can we explain such a statement?
Post-1995 – Thomas Ice’s article “Inventor of False Pre-Trib Rapture History” states that my book “The Rapture Plot” is “only one of the latest in a series of revisions of his original discourse….” And David Reagan in his article “The Origin of the Concept of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture” repeats Ice’s falsehood by claiming that I have republished my first book “over the years under several different titles.”
Although my book repeats a bit of the Macdonald origin of pretrib (for new readers), all of my books are packed with new material not found in my other works. For some clarification, “The Incredible Cover-Up” has photos of pertinent places in Ireland, Scotland, and England not found in my later books plus several chapters dealing with theological arguments; “The Great Rapture Hoax” quotes scholars throughout the Church Age, covers Scofield’s hidden side, a section on Powerscourt, the 1980 election, the Jupiter Effect, Gundry’s change, and more theological arguments; “The Rapture Plot” reveals for the first time the Great Evangelical Revisionism/Robbery and includes appendices on miscopying, plagiarism, etc.; and “The Three R’s” shows hypocritical evangelicals employing occultic beliefs they say they have long opposed!
So Thomas Ice etc. are twisting truth when they claim I am only a revisionist. Do they really think that my publishers DON’T know what I’ve previously written?
Re arguments, Google “Pretrib Rapture – Hidden Facts” and also obtain “The End Times Passover” and “Why Christians Will Suffer ‘Great Tribulation’ ” (AuthorHouse, 2006) by media personality Joe Ortiz.
1997 – For years Harvest House Publishers has owned and been republishing Lindsey’s book “There’s A New World Coming.” During the same time Lindsey has been peddling his reportedly “new” book “Apocalyse Code” (1997), much of which is word-for-word the same as the Harvest House book – and there’s no notice of “simultaneous publishing” in either book! Talk about pretrib greed!
1997 – This is the year I discovered that more than 50 pages of Dallas Seminary professor Merrill Unger’s book “Beyond the Crystal Ball” (Moody Press, 1973) constituted a colossal plagiarism of Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970). After Lindsey’s book came out, Unger had complained that Lindsey’s book had plagiarized his classroom lecture notes. It was evident that Unger felt that he too should cash in on his own lectures! (The detailed account of this Dallas Seminary dishonesty is revealed in my 1998 book “The Three R’s.”)
1998 – Tim LaHaye’s “Understanding the Last Days” (1998) plagiarized Lindsey’s “There’s A New World Coming” (1973).
1999 – More than 200 pages (out of 396 pages) in Lindsey’s 1999 book “Vanished Into Thin Air” are virtually carbon copies of pages in his 1983 book “The Rapture” – with no “updated” or “revised” notice included! Lindsey has done the same nervy thing with several of his books, something that has allowed him to live in million-dollar-plus homes and drive cars like Ferraris! (See my Google articles “Deceiving and Being Deceived” and “Thieves’ Marketing” for further evidence of this notably pretrib vice.)
2000 – A Jack Van Impe article “The Moment After” (2000) plagiarized Grant Jeffrey’s book “Final Warning” (1995).
2001 – Since 2001 my web article “Walvoord’s Posttrib ‘Varieties’ – Plus” has been exposing his devious muddying up of posttrib waters. In some of his books he invented four “distinct” and “contradictory” posttrib divisions, claiming that they are either “classic” or “semiclassic” or “futurist” or “dispensational” – distinctions that disappear when analyzed! His “futurist” group holds to a literal future tribulation and a literal millennium but doesn’t embrace “any day” imminency. But his “dispensational” group has the same non-imminency! Moreover, tribulational futurism is found in every group except the first one, and he somehow admitted that a literal millennium is in all four groups! On the other hand, it’s the pretribs who consistently disagree with each other over their chief points and subpoints – but somehow end up agreeing that there will be a pretrib rapture! (See my chapter “A House Divided” in my book “The Incredible Cover-Up.”)
2001 – Since my “Deceiving and Being Deceived” web item which exposed the claims for Pseudo-Ephraem” and “Morgan Edwards” as teachers of pretrib, there has been a piranha-like frenzy on the part of pretrib bodyguards and their duped groupies to “discover” almost anything before 1830 walking upright on two legs that seemed to have at least a remote hint of pretrib! (An exemplary poster boy for such pretrib practice is Grant Jeffrey. To get your money’s worth, Google “Wily Jeffrey.”)
FINALLY: Don’t take my word for any of the above. Read my 300-page book “The Rapture Plot” which has a jillion more documented details on the long-hidden but now-revealed history of the dishonest, 179-year-old, fringe-British-invented, American-merchandised-until-the-real-bad-stuff-happens pretribulation rapture fad. If this book of mine doesn’t “move” you, I will personally refund what you paid for it!
It appears the author has done his research. I personally do not hold to a particular view concerning the timing of the Rapture. As I read through biblical prophecies I can see a case made for each of the various theories concerning when the Rapture will take place. If it was so clearly delineated in the Bible when it would happen there would not be so much contention over the issue. I am willing to bet that most Christians who believe in the Rapture (pre-,mid-,pre-wrath-,or post-) would agree on the fundamentals of the Christian faith. They would agree that we are saved by the blood atonement of Jesus’ death, that Jesus was born of a virgin, and that Jesus is God the Son. This is because these doctrines are made plain in the Scriptures. Why then is there not a general consensus on when the Rapture will take place? Because the Bible is not clear as to when that event will happen. For every Christian who insists that the Rapture will take place before the Tribulation, you can probably find one who insists it will take place after the Tribulation. However, most likely you would find these two opposing sides agreeing on the doctrines of salvation and the deity of Jesus. The only aspect concerning the Rapture that I am adamant about is that it is going to take place. Paul talked about it in 1 Thessalonians 4 and 1 Corinthians 15. When it will take place I cannot say.