Knox Theological Seminary has posted an open letter on their web site to evangelical Christians who support the Jews’ right to the land of Israel. Their position is from a teaching that is known as Replacement Theology which states that Christians have replaced the Jews as God’s people and therefore have obtained all the promises that God gave to the Jews in the Old Testament. This open letter can be found at An Open Letter to Evangelicals and Other Interested Parties: The People of God, the Land of Israel, and the Impartiality of the Gospel.
When Christians resort to spiritualizing the plain reading of God’s word then it is incumbent on Bible-literalists to speak out and correct the error of their teaching (James 5:19-20). I wish to address the belief that since the majority of Jews rejected Jesus as their Messiah all covenant relationships were dissolved between God and the Jews. What does God’s word say about this?
We will start with what is known as the Abrahamic Covenant. This is God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis that the physical land of Israel would be given to Abraham and his descendants.
- Genesis 12:7 – And the LORD appeared unto Abraham and said, “Unto your descendants will I give this land.”
- Genesis 13:14-15 – And the LORD said unto Abraham, “Lift up your eyes and look from the place where you are standing, north, south, east, and west. For the land which you see, to you will I give it and to your descendants forever.”
When you or I speak of our ancestors or our descendants we are speaking of physical human beings related to us. We are not speaking about our relatives in a spiritual sense. Therefore the plain reading of this text declares that God will give the land of Israel forever to the physical descendants of Abraham. As we will see the physical descendants of Abraham to whom this promise was made are the Jews.
God didn’t just promise the land to Abraham only but He also made the same promise to Abraham’s son Isaac.
- Genesis 17:7-8;19-21 – “And I will establish my covenant between me and you and your descendants after you in their generations for an everlasting covenant to be a God unto you and to your descendants after you. And I will give unto you and to your descendants all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession.” And God said to Abraham “Sarah, your wife, will bear you a son and you shall call his name Isaac and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant and with his descendants after him. As for Ishmael, I have blessed him and will make him fruitful and will make him a great nation. But my covenant will I establish with Isaac.”
Here God renews His everlasting covenant with Abraham but God also makes an everlasting covenant with Isaac, Abraham’s son. There are two interesting observations here. The first is that God has shown in this verse that the covenant would descend physically to Isaac. The second is that God also established the covenant not just with Abraham but also with Isaac and thereby Isaac’s descendants who are the Jews.
This is the plain reading of the scriptures pertaining to the Abrahamic Covenant. Now I will respond to the various claims made by Knox Theological Seminary (KTS) in their open letter. I will write my responses under the heading of the Roman numerals as they correspond to those Roman numerals in the KTS open letter.
I. – I agree completely with KTS that salvation is an undeserved, unearned gift of God through the sacrificial death of the Jesus the Messiah.
II. – I agree completely with KTS that All human beings are sinners and under the God’s judgment of death. However, neither I nor the Bible agree with KTS that apart from Christ there is no special divine favor upon any member of any ethnic group; nor is there any divine promise of an earthly land or a heavenly inheritance to anyone, whether Jew or Gentile.
- Romans 11:25-29 states: “(25)For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. (26) And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: (27)For this is MY COVENANT unto them, when I shall take away their sins. (28)As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are BELOVED for the patriarch’s sakes. (29)For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.”
In verse 27 God says that He has a covenant with the unbelieving Jews to save them after the fullness of the Gentiles has been fulfilled. Verse 28 states clearly that even though the Jews are enemies of the gospel they are beloved because of their patriarchal ancestors. Finally verse 29 states that the gifts of God are irrevocable therefore God’s gift of the land to the Jews is irrevocable.
III. – I agree completely with KTS that God, who takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked, has made only one way of salvation. That way is through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ alone.
IV. – I agree with KTS that Jesus is fully man and fully God who took away the sin of the world through His sacrificial death. I also agree that Jesus’ sacrifice fulfilled the sacrifices that God ordained the Jews to offer in the Old Testament. I also agree that all who would worship God must come through Jesus Christ in Spirit and in truth. However, neither I nor the Bible NOR THE APOSTLE PAUL agrees with KTS that the death of Jesus eternally ended the sacrifices of the Jewish temple. That Jewish believers could still offer sacrifices at the Jewish Temple, possibly as a memorial sacrifice is evidenced by the following section of scripture.
- Acts 21:26 states: “Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.”
Here we see that the apostle Paul, who had been saved for many years, still entered the Jewish Temple and made a sacrifice long after Jesus’ death and resurrection.
V. – I completely agree with KTS that as many as receive Christ alone through faith alone, both Jews and Gentiles alike, God gives to them eternal life.
VI. – I agree with KTS that believers in Jesus Christ are of the seed of Abraham. In the case of Gentile believers this of course pertains to a spiritual seed since we are not physically a descendant of Abraham unless of course a Gentile believer is a physical descendant of Ishmael and therefore a physical descendant of his father, Abraham. However, the Abrahamic covenant was not given through Ishmael but through Isaac and therefore the Jews. You will not find the phrase the “church of Israel” in the Old Testament. The Gospel writer Luke (most likely a Gentile) wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit to Theophilus and used the Greek word “ekklesia” of Israel which various translations render as church, congregation, assembly, etc. However, I do not agree that the Jews cannot participate in the Abrahamic Covenant. As stated above, Romans 11:27-29 shows that the current unbelief of the Jews does not nullify their participation in the covenants God made with them.
- “(27)For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. (28)As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the patriarch’s sakes. (29)For the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.”
VII. – I completely agree with KTS that Jesus was referring to His body as a Temple. But the verse KTS quotes illustrates that Jesus was not talking about the physical temple of God: John 2:19-21, “Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.’ Then the Jews said, ‘It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will you raise it up in three days?’” But he was speaking of the temple of his body.” If as the KTS believes, Jesus is the only temple of God, then how is the “man of lawlessness” that the apostle Paul speaks about in II Thessalonians 2:1-4 going to enter into Jesus and declare himself God?
- “(1) Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, (2) That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. (3) Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of lawlessness be revealed, the son of perdition; (4) Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”
The plain reading of Paul’s writing here shows clearly that he expected there to be a physical temple built before the time of the second coming of Jesus. Since KTS says that Christians have no need of a physical temple then it has to be the Jews who build this “third” Temple for the man of lawlessness to enter into. For the Jews to fulfill this prophecy of Paul’s they have to be in the land of Israel and in control of the Temple Mount.
VIII. – I agree with KTS that the apostle Peter spoke about the creation of the New Heavens and the New Earth. But to extrapolate from this that since Peter didn’t mention the restoration of the kingdom of Israel there is not going to be a future kingdom of Israel is in error. As a matter of fact, the scripture that KTS also quotes in this section Acts 1:6-7, “Therefore, when [the disciples] had come together, they asked [Jesus], saying, ‘Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?’ And he said to them, “It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in his own authority.’” shows that the disciples expected there to be a restoration of the kingdom of Israel. Jesus did not correct them and say “Where did you get that teaching from?” He simply stated that it was not for the disciples to know when the restoration of the kingdom of Israel was going to take place.
IX. – Neither the Bible nor I agree with the KTS position that the Bible does not declare that the land of Israel belongs to the Jews. If as the KTS states in this section, the promises of the land were fulfilled under Joshua’s reign then that means that there are no further claims to the land available. Therefore the land of Israel belongs to Joshua and the Jews and no other ethnic group after them had or has a right to the land. Amos 9:14-15 agrees with this assessment: “I will bring again the captivity of my people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them. And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the LORD thy God.” The Jewish disciples never claimed that the land of Israel belonged to Christians. Therefore the early Christians cannot be the ones the Bible speaks about being scattered across the earth and thereby be the ones regathered to the land of Israel. When the Bible speaks of God bringing the captivity of Israel back to the land He can only be speaking about the physical Jews.
X. – I completely agree with the KTS that bad theology led to the crusades which led to tragic cruelty against both Moslems and Jews. But the bad Christian theology that was the impetus for the crusades is the one being espoused by KTS and Replacement Theology. This theology states that the land of Israel belongs not to the Jews but to the spiritual heirs of the Abrahamic covenant, the Christians. Therefore the crusaders thought that they had a mandate from God to take over the land of Israel as the heirs of the Abrahamic Covenant. If anyone from KTS reads this open letter I hope they will be more restrained in the future about assigning blood-guiltiness to other Christians. That’s a dangerous implication to lay on God’s children and I cannot believe that He is pleased with such terminology being used against them.
The apostle Paul under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit wrote the following section of scriptures in Romans 13:1-2, “Let every soul be subject unto the governing powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.” If, as Paul states here, God sets up the governments then we have to believe that God ordained the Jews’ modern return to the land of Israel. In Ezekiel chapter 37 God speaks of the restoration of the Jews to the land of Israel as taking place in stages.
- “(1)The hand of the LORD was upon me, and carried me out in the spirit of the LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones,
(2) And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry.
(3) And he said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest.
(4) Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.
(5) Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live:
(6) And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.
(7) So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone.
(8) And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them.
(9) Then said he unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.
(10) So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.
(11) Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts.
(12) Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.
(13) And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,
(14) And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.”
We can see from these scriptures that the Jews start out as dry, dusty bones but end up as spirit-filled human beings at the end. Just because modern-day Israel is a secular nation at this time does not mean that at Jesus’ second coming they will not be spirit-filled believers. For Zechariah 12: 9-10 declares, “And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced.” Since Jesus is returning to the land of Israel at His second coming the unbelieving Jews will have to already be in the land to see Him.
I will continue my support for the Jews’ right to the land of Israel as promised to them by God in His word who created the land of Israel, the whole earth, and the Universe.
Related posts:
- Does the land of Israel belong to the Jews? New Evangelicalism, Sojourners, and others versus Christian Zionism (April 29, 2009) There is an evangelical organization called Sojourners which was founded in 1971...The problem I've come across in reading the writings of Sojourner leaders and followers is that they seem to downplay the significance of God's revealed word found in the Holy Bible...The purpose of my article deals...
- Does the land of Israel belong to the “Israel of God” (the Christian Church)? (March 10, 2010) There are Christians who believe that the Christian Church has replaced the Jewish nation of Israel which God created in the Old Testament. They quote the apostle Paul's letter to the Galatians where he called Christians the "Israel of God". (Galatians 6:16) They believe that since the...
Print This Post
I am very grateful for your response to the anti-Semitic tripe produced by Knox Seminary. I was appalled when I read just how much Preterism has infiltrated this school. I have been in the kingdom 30 plus years. I have taught Jewish Evangelism during that time and even helped to develop a series of teachings on that subject.
The “Open Letter” hurt me deeply because I can remember walking to the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church (CRPC) and sitting in the back, listening to Dr. Kennedy. God used that man and church to water the seeds of the gospel until I came into the kingdom. I have since thanked Dr. Kennedy for his faithfulness to the gospel and the way God used his preaching in my life.
I currently serve the Lord at Creation Studies Institute (CSI) as well as leading a support group ministry with messianic leanings called Biblical Alternatives Fellowship here in Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Our ministry has ties to both Calvary Chapel and CRPC. That church just suffered a split and I cannot help to think it is linked to the fact that they have been embracing Preterism more and more since Dr. Kennedy went home to be with the Lord.
I know that Dr. Kennedy avoided preaching on this subject, e.g. Preterism and often had messianic Jewish believers like like Jews for Jesus’ Moishe Rosen and Stan Telchin on his radio program “Truths that Transform.” So this offensive letter grieves me deeply. Thank you for your response. I can only say I appreciate you and your ministry. A cautionary tale concerning their letter is that neo-Nazis and other white supremacist groups have linked to it.
Thank you Pastor Rowitt for your response. In February 2003 I attended a prophecy conference in Columbus Ohio where I heard Zola Levitt speak. He mentioned the Open Letter in a passing remark during his presentation. He said that we could find it on the Internet. When I got home I searched the Web and did find it. I immediately posted a response to it on my first website at http://www.iesouschristos.com (I posted the same article to my second site which is the one you read). I even engaged in a short debate with someone on the staff of Knox Theological Seminary. The Bible could not be more clear that God gave Eretz Yisrael to the Jews for an everlasting covenant yet inexplicably some Bible-believing Christians subscribe to the Replacement Theology doctrine. This false teaching seems to have found a home in the Emergent Church movement. If you have not done so already you may want to read my post titled Does the Land of Israel belong to the Jews? In that article I present a debate I had with a proponent of Replacement Theology on the progressive Sojourners website. Your notation concerning the White Supremacists has always intrigued me. How could anyone who names the name of Christ be Anti-Semitic? Jesus was Jewish as were His disciples and the overwhelming majority of the first generation of Christians. Yet these same people who hate Jews love Jesus? Thank you again for your positive input and may God bless your ministry.